After re-publishing my most recent December contribution to Turntable Talk yesterday, it occurred to me I never posted my submission for November’s installment of the great monthly participatory feature hosted by fellow blogger Dave from A Sound Day. The culprit was a temporary hiatus from blogging due to a family vacation in Europe, combined with bad memory – after my return, I simply forgot!
Before finally getting to it, I’d like to acknowledge yesterday’s 80th birthday of Keith Richards, which feels especially appropriate, given this is a post about The Rolling Stones! Richards joined the club of octogenarians after Mick Jagger did this past July. Who would have thought in the early ’70s when the Stones arguably hit their high The Glimmer Twins would still be rocking in their ’80s! ‘On with the show,’ as I’ve heard Keith say during Stones gigs.
# # #
I can’t believe Turntable Talk is hitting 20 – congrats on this milestone, Dave, and keeping this such a fun feature by continuing to come up with great topics. This time you asked, Do we still care about the Rolling Stones? I guess you won’t be surprised about my spontaneous answer: hell, yes!
Unlike The Beatles who have been my favorite band since my early teenage years back in Germany, my love for The Rolling Stones started a few years later and developed more gradually. If asked today whether to pick The Beatles or the Stones, I would still go with The Fab Four, though the Stones would be a close second. I also feel it’s difficult to directly compare the two groups since their styles ended up being very different.
How do you assess the relevance of a music artist objectively? The first thing I thought was their sales of music. I found this website, ChartMasters, which calculates total equivalent album sales (EAS) across all music formats. Using their methodology, The Rolling Stones have 244.55 million EAS. This puts them at no. 6, ahead of Pink Floyd (238.57 million) and behind Madonna (248.35 million) – certainly not a spot that would suggest irrelevance! The Beatles top the list with 423.9 million EAS – of course, they do!😊
Since the aforementioned sales volumes are cumulative, I figured they favor acts who started selling music a long time ago compared to those who are newer. Next, I thought that looking at top grossing concert tours should provide a more level playing field. Last year, The Rolling Stones came in at no. 6 on Billboard’s Top Tours 2022, grossing $179.35 million, behind Coldplay ($208 million) and ahead of Red Hot Chili Peppers ($177 million). Again, an impressive showing!
A third gauge I came up with to capture current relevance is followers on Spotify, something ChartMasters tracks as well. The top 3 are Ed Sheeran (114.9 million), Ariana Grande (94.26 million) and Arijit Singh (93.2 million). By comparison, the Stones and The Beatles have 13.4 million and 26.31 million followers, respectively. I think this outcome is a good illustration that assessing relevance very much depends on how you measure it.
The other day, I learned about Perplexity AI, an AI-powered search engine and chatbot. Putting my decidedly mixed feelings about AI aside, I was curious to see what kind of answer I would get to the question, Are The Rolling Stones still relevant? Here’s what I got (with references, which I removed):
The Rolling Stones are still relevant today, despite having been around for over 60 years. Here are some reasons why:
• Live shows: The Rolling Stones remain one of the most electrifying live acts in music, and their tours continue to draw large crowds and sell out stadiums.
• Timeless music: The songs recorded by the Rolling Stones in the 60s continue to cast a lasting influence on popular culture, and their music is still enjoyed by both old and new generations of fans.
• Adaptability: The Rolling Stones have managed to adapt and anticipate new musical trends while remaining true to their rock ‘n roll and blues roots. They have also continued to release new music, with their last album “Blue & Lonesome” being a return to their blues days.
• Cultural legacy: The Rolling Stones are one of the most important bands in the history of music, and their impact on popular culture cannot be overstated. They have influenced countless musicians and continue to be studied and analyzed by scholars.
Overall, the Rolling Stones are still relevant today due to their continued success in live performances, their timeless music, their adaptability, and their cultural legacy.
This doesn’t look like a bad answer, especially if you consider it only took a couple seconds to obtain it. Obviously, Perplexity AI missed Hackney Diamonds, the new album by the Stones – one illustration AI-generated content isn’t entirely up to date. Not yet!
After all the above attempts to address the topic as objectively as possible, I came to the brilliant conclusion that all of the above matters relatively little. None of it changes the fact that The Rolling Stones remain relevant to me. Why? Because I love their music – it’s really as simple as that at the end of the day!
I’d like to leave you with five Stones songs I dig:
The Last Time (single, February 1965)
I always loved the guitar riff. While credited to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, the song is adapted from a traditional gospel song The Staples Singers released in 1954 as It May Be the Last Time. The Last Time became the Stones’ third no. 1 on the UK Singles Chart.
She’s a Rainbow (single Nov 1967)
While it’s perhaps uncharacteristic for the Stones, I’ve liked She’s a Rainbow from the first time I heard it many moons ago. That great piano part was played by Nicky Hopkins. John Paul Jones, then still a session musician who would later join Led Zeppelin, provided the string arrangement. This was the second upfront single from Their Satanic Majesties Request, a studio album the Stones released in December 1967.
Jumpin’ Jack Flash (single, May 1968)
This non-album single is another terrific riff-based song. The Stones recorded it during the Beggars Banquet sessions. While it certainly didn’t lack great songs, I’m still somewhat puzzled Jumpin’ Jack Flash didn’t make the album. I once read Richards still the kicks playing the song during live shows – can’t blame him!
Dead Flowers (Sticky Fingers, April 1971)
One of my all-time favorite songs by The Rolling Stones, off my favorite album Sticky Fingers. This song came together during a time when Richards’ friendship with Gram Parsons influenced his writing. I love the guitar lines he traded with Mick Taylor throughout the track. The solo in place of a third verse was performed by Taylor – perhaps the ultimate bar band song!
It’s Only Rock ‘n’ Roll (But I Like It) (It’s Only Rock ‘n Roll, October 1974)
The title track from the Stones’ 74 studio album kind of sums up why I love the Stones: It’s only rock & roll, but I like it. Then-future Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood collaborated with Jagger on the song, though it’s only credited to Jagger and Richards, as usual. David Bowie sang backing vocals to Jagger’s lead. Also notable, bass and drums were provided by Willie Weeks and Kenny Jones, respectively, instead of Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts.
If you haven’t checked out Hackney Diamonds, I can highly recommend it. This latest album by the Stones provides my evidence the greatest rock & roll band in the world remains very relevant, at least in my completely unbiased opinion!😊
Sources: Wikipedia; ChartMasters; Billboard; Perplexity AI; YouTube